Flip Through

Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV. Show all posts

Monday, December 31, 2012

Year's finest

I have returned from winter rambles...with A List. Behold my Top Ten Various Awesome Things of 2012 in no particular order, because real blogging what's real blogging?

10. Favorite Cover of "Black Betty": Gypsyhawk (live at the Old Towne in Pasadena). So. Much. Hair.

9. Favorite New Ongoing Comic from One of the Big Two: Captain Marvel, motherfuckers. Kelly Sue Deconnick and Company (including the Dodsons, Jamie McKelvie, and Emma Rios) knock it out of the park twice a month with the Carol Corps. Amazing art and fantastic writing, continually the best book of the week.

(via Kelly Sue's website)

8. Favorite YA Novel About Dragons: Seraphina, by Rachel Hartman. I received this book as a birthday gift and devoured it in about two days. Fresh, original use of dragons and really well-developed political setting. Very much looking forward to the sequel. 

7. Favorite Spiritual Offspring of Veronica Mars: Pretty Little Liars, obviously. I continue to be so rabidly obsessed with this show that I'm considering rewatching VM (for the fourth time) to write something really obnoxious about the two. You've been warned. 



6. Favorite Nerd Convention: Geek Girl Con. Sacrificing a goat toward the goal of going again this year, because this con is not to be missed.

5. Favorite Timesuck Social Networking Site: Twitter, you're old news...Tumblr is my master now. 

(via duh)

4. Favorite Northeast Ohio Regional Beer: Market Garden's Cluster Fuggle IPA. Nommmm. If you're in the Great Lakes brewpub, be sure to stumble across the street to Market Garden too.

3. Favorite Liveblogging Event: Mark Reads Tamora Pierce. 'Nuff said.

(via Mark Reads)

2. Favorite Fangirl Squee: The Pacific Rim trailer. Holy fuckballs I need this movie to be out already. 

1. Favorite New Lead Singer of My Best-Beloved Band: Tommy, baby, you're amazing and we love you. A thousand welcomes. Now please headline the US.


Monday, December 10, 2012

I just always seem to find new layers (Pretty Little Liars spoilers)

Yesterday Gail Simone confirmed that she'd been kicked off the Batgirl title--VIA EMAIL--and that the "Death of the Family" crossover arc would be her last issues. I have no more fucks to give with DC as far as taking up space on my personal blog is concerned, so if you'd like to read my thoughts on this matter, head here.

In happier news, Pretty Little Liars returns in less than a month and ever since I started watching it (so...since Thanksgiving weekend) I've been wanting to write something about why I enjoy it so much. What else am I going to do in the interim but overanalyze and rewatch, right? The thing with this show is that I didn't expect to actually enjoy it; I just figured it could fit into the gap left by Gossip Girl as fun, trashy, content-free television. Happily, that is not the case! Superficially PLL is a soapy teen drama, full of shoplifting, improbable outfits, deadly secrets, on-again-off-again romances, and familial troubles, but beneath the trappings and tropes is a pleasantly subversive show. Most strikingly, PLL provides something that is all too rare in pop media: an apparently-bulletproof core of female friendships. In most TV shows in this ouvre, whether or not one or all of the girls would turn on each other would be a major and probably ongoing plot point; this never comes up in PLL. Even toward the middle of season three, when Emily believes her girlfriend Paige is innocent and the rest of the Liars do not, their friendship isn't killed or even really shaken. All involved acknowledge that they're at odds in this matter, and go about trying to find out the truth, business as usual. Spencer, Hanna, and Aria's main concern is keeping Emily safe, not proving her wrong. The narrative actually plays into this in season two, starting off an episode with the four apparently squabbling and squaring off, only to reveal that they're fake-fighting in order to play A (their mysterious anon threat) by using A's constant surveillance of them against him/her. The idea that the four friends will ever "break up" is basically unfathomable. For my money, instead of taking interest away from their interconnected relationships, this baseline of faith adds tension. Will there ever be something A can throw at them that will make one of them crack? Why is it so important for them to remain friends? Is the glue of their relationship just Ali, or something more? Where is the line between close friendship and insular co-dependence?

(GIRLS. YOU GIVE ME SO MANY FEELS.)

Another area in which PLL deviates from the norm is in romance. Perhaps most notably, one of the Liars is gay, with more than one relationship and nearly as many intimate scenes with her girlfriends as the other Liars have with their boyfriends. Emily's coming-out experience is given lots of depth and time on the screen, and her relationships are as plot-significant as Spencer, Aria, and Hanna's. None of the girls are shamed by the narrative for their sexual choices--not even Aria, when it would be so easy for the characters around her to slam her with the "daddy issues" label--and none of them are punished in any regard for having sex (at least not yet...it remains to be seen what Toby's angle is).  PLL deals fairly with its male characters as well as the female ones, and I was especially fond of the initial portrayal of Lucas, who was allowed to be a decent human being instead of an opportunistic Nice Guy, though his current personality status is up in the air. You could argue that Hanna's first encounter with Caleb falls under the "sex turns men into monsters" trope, but she makes the decision to walk away, rather than having Caleb love-and-leave her. Their ongoing relationship is unusually equitable, with the only power imbalances coming from the secret-keeping that is the show's backbone (and thus can't really be done away with), and refreshing in its portrayal of a "bad boy" character who a) doesn't need to be "tamed" because he isn't actually a bad person and b) is forthright about his feelings. Interestingly, the show also goes hard for older man/younger woman relationships (Spencer is involved in some degree with all of her adult sister's boyfriends/fiances, Aria is in a relationship with her English teacher and also has some weirdness with Jason DiLaurentis, and it's implied in the mid-season finale of season 3 that the deceased Alison DiLaurentis had some sort of relationship with Byron Montgomery, Aria's father, as well as other older guys). But, again, the show doesn't present any of the girls as victims--not even Ali--and it's consistently implied or shown outright that Aria and Spencer hold the power in their relationships, rather than being preyed upon by adult men. A might try to hold the Liars' relationships over their heads as bait or threat, but the narrative itself is on their side. Toby, eventually Spencer's boyfriend, is a survivor of a pretty fucked-up relationship with his (villainous, oddly compelling) stepsister Jenna, and it's also pretty rare to see a male rape survivor on a "family" network show. His experience and its effects have yet to be fully examined on the show, but given the Big Reveal of season 3 so far, I'm betting the latter half will go into the wherefore of Toby's actions.

 
Finally there's the Hanna/Ashley relationship. Hanna is my favorite character and a good part of the emotion behind that is how she interacts with her mother, Ashley Marin. Truthfully, all the girls have really interesting relationships with their mothers, but Hanna and Ashley hit a bit closer to home, possibly because it's just them in the house, which is something I relate to. They have many shared attributes: fashion sense, pride, stubbornness, protectiveness--and they also have a certain armor that covers an instinct for generosity. After Spencer and Veronica, Ashley and Hanna are the pairing where it's easiest to see the mother's influence on the daughter, for better or worse. Watching their relationship develop in two and a half seasons has been far more rewarding than six seasons of Lily and Serena backstabbing each other and then falling back to "but we love each other because we're family" on Gossip Girl. Perhaps not as quippy as Rory and Lorelai or as moving as Joyce and Buffy, but certainly as cutthroat as Lily and Serena, Hanna and Ashley are up there in my pantheon of favorite moms and daughters. Here's hoping for a bit more inspection of Hanna's relationship to food and her mother's relationship to sex (no, really, I do wonder a bit if her romance with Pastor Ted will wind up being similar to Hanna's with Sean).


Pretty Little Liars isn't a perfect television show, but it's more than adequate as  both an engaging drama and commentary on pop culture and the socialization of teenage girls in the US. It presents a realistic situation for many teen girls wrapped in the ostensibly ridiculous premise of a friend's murder: that a person's entire world is watching them, waiting for them to screw up, itching to take them down or shame them in any way possible, gossip about them, be cruel to them or force them to be cruel to others, present them with an array of impossible choices. That is teenagehood for many girls--a claustrophobic atmosphere of nerves, indecision, judgment, and fear. At worst, PLL normalizes bad behavior--shoplifting, lying, blackmail, bullying (an accusation lobbed at many teen shows and one I don't have much time for); at best it invites discussion about those behaviors and their roots through the exaggeration and heightened stakes of the Liars' world.

Sunday, December 02, 2012

Stick a fork in me, I'm done

I don't know how the makers of Pretty Little Liars manage to actually lace their show with crack, but

it's a problem.



A glorious problem.

Tuesday, January 03, 2012

I don't even know (Boardwalk Empire spoilers)

Whether by accident or design (I'm voting design), Boardwalk Empire presents a bona fide King Arthur story in the telling of the tales of Prohibition-era Atlantic City, Nucky Thompson, and Jimmy Darmody. All the characters are here: Gillian as the mother-temptress Morgause; Margaret and Lucy as twin Guenevers and Owen as Lancelot; and Jimmy and Nucky in the roles of Mordred and Arthur. The painted whore that is Roaring Twenties Atlantic City is the dark mirror image of Camelot: a false golden era replete with crime and controlled by robber barons, bootleggers, and mob bosses. Above it all Nucky looms, his fingers in every pie in existence, struggling to keep his motley array of Companions (Neary, Doyle, O'Neill, Eli) in line, and treating with rival kings (Torrio, Rothstein, the D'Alessios, Chalky White). A bootlegging, philandering, glad-handing criminal and hypocrite, Nucky embodies the trope that Might makes Right--the very opposite of what Arthur traditionally stands for.

Jimmy returns from the Great War, considering himself proven as a man on the field of battle and itching for more power and responsibility in Nucky's operation. His bastard's birthright is double, having been born of the Commodore, whose power is fading (and who represents Lot, a petty king who is ineffective and then dead in the Arthur myth), and raised by Nucky, still in his prime. He expects to inherit, and soon...and a stew of resentment begins to seethe as he sows the seeds of his own destruction. In an attempt to strike out on his own he betrays Nucky, gathering around himself other betrayers, including his father, the Commodore, Gillian, and Nucky's brother Eli. Jimmy's wife Angela can be viewed as either Gareth--the innocent mowed down by accident, a victim of the strife between Mordred and Arthur--or Elaine, a woman slain by her attempts to control her own life. His mother Gillian is the quintessential Morgause; simultaneously she is a mother figure, raising Jimmy and then his son, and a sex bomb who takes partners as she will, including men much younger than herself. The pivotal moment of incest, which in the Arthur stories occurs either between Morgan le Fay and Arthur or Morgause and Arthur, occurs in Boardwalk Empire between Jimmy and Gillian, read as Mordred and Morgause.

Into the midst of Nucky's neat operation trots Agent Nelson van Alden, the most uptight lawman in New Jersey and a man possessed by the need to take Nucky down. In the Arthur stories, the character of Maleagant (or Maleagrance) is a villain, a rival petty king who kidnaps Guenever; since Boardwalk Empire's protagonists are villains themselves, it makes sense that the ostensible "good" character of van Alden would oppose Nucky and what he stands for. His relationships with the dual Guenever characters of Margaret and Lucy cement his characterization, as he threatens the security of Nucky's throne by lusting after Margaret and encouraging her to betray Nucky, and impregnating Lucy. Margaret, in her turn, cheats on Nucky with his driver/bodyguard Owen Sleater, an act which heralds her (re)turn to religion and belief that she is being punished for her sins. The Guenever of the Arthur stories is notably barren, of course, but the functions of the traditional Gwen and the two characters we read as her avatars in Boardwalk Empire are similar: to be beautiful, ornamental, and available for sex, to complement her man in social situations, and to not comment on or be involved in business matters.

The series-wide theme of the current generation's effect on the rising generation occurs repeatedly in various guises--Jimmy's son Tommy ultimately loses both parents and will presumably have his future shaped and warped, as Jimmy's was, by Gillian; Nucky's lack of children is a thorn in his side and perhaps the reason why he takes such pains to hold onto Margaret and her children by her previous husband, and we see his effect on Margaret's son already (in Nucky's episode of arson on his childhood home); Eli's huge brood of children is arguably his only success in life, that of reproductive, evolutionary prowess; van Alden's daughter, though born out of wedlock, is precious to him and it seems that he will have the raising of her after his wife divorces him (since Lucy has no care for her daughter). So, in a phrase from The Mists of Avalon, what of the king stag when the young stag is grown? Jimmy is ready to take over for Nucky but Nucky isn't ready to relinquish the reins. Humanity spends its life fighting the natural course of things, the cycle of living and dying. No man will admit when he should retire--encapsulated perfectly in the Commodore's fight to hang onto life and his relevance to Atlantic City's community. Nucky too is incapable of giving up his power, and Jimmy's attempt to take that power for himself results in his downfall.

Season 2 of Boardwalk Empire ends with Mordred dead and Arthur still in control; but where will it go from there? The saga of Arthur and Mordred culminates in both men's deaths (or with Arthur retiring to Avalon). Obviously the show diverges by necessity at this point, and I look forward to seeing what the writers throw at us next...though clearly I will miss parsing its plots and characters in terms of my favorite mythology.

Tuesday, September 06, 2011

NETFLIX IS MY MASTER NOW

Things I watched on my completely un-laborious Labor Day:

  • Romeo Must Die (a film that I own on DVD)
  • 4 episodes of Stargate: SG1 (including the scary creepy horrible insect ep, which I endure because at the end Teal'c plays with squirt guns)
  • Iron Man 2 (is it just me or are the Pepper-and-Natasha scenes the best parts of this film?)
  • the second half of Hunger (I watched the first half ages ago)

I don't know what this says about my psyche, so I'm just going to note how much I love Netflix Instant and that it's a good thing I waited until after graduating to sign up for it.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Jerry is a great vampire name and everything is better sans Matty Fresh (spoilers)

Since yesterday was my birthday and sort of a DIANA APPRECIATION DAY, period, I decided to skip my usual Sunday post and go right for the movie reviews for this week. To that end...


Who else went to see Fright Night specifically for David Tennant in leather pants and wound up pleasantly surprised at the entire venture? That is actually a damn good comedy-horror film. I saw the original one (at some point in undergrad) and didn't really remember a thing about it other than that it was funny, and I wasn't expecting some grand splash since remakes usually suck, but yes, Fright Night is actually quite a fine movie. The pacing is good, with an interesting set-up involving McLovin, ahem, Ed Lee (Christopher Mintz-Plasse), a go-go dancer named Doris, and some adorkable homemade videos, and then Jerry (Colin Farrell) blows up the Brewsters' house, forcing Charley (Anton Yelchin), his mom Jane (Toni Collette), and his girlfriend Amy (Imogen Poots) into a bizarro alliance with Midori'd-out stage magician Peter Vincent (David Tennant, in leather pants. Also in underwear, silk robes, and cute jeans). For a reasonably campy and done premise (who doesn't know far more than they want to about vampires at this point?), the actors and pacing of the script make Fright Night way better than it should be. Yelchin, Farrell, and Tennant are reliably awesome; Yelchin as a still-awkward nerd done well who knows what color "puce" is, Farrell as the vamp next door who ALSO knows what puce looks like; and Tennant as an over-the-top liqueur-swilling stage magician who knows vampires are real but likes to drink that knowledge away. Farrell in particular I found pretty spectacular. In terms of "who do I want to look at?" Tennant wins every time, but the way Farrell played his Jerry, as a slouching, grinning, truck-driving dudebro of a vamp, was just fucking fun. It's clear all the way through that Jerry knows Charley knows and he doesn't give a damn, because he's a 400-year-old vampire who can afford to play with his prey. Another way in which Fright Night wins is that it didn't let itself get bogged down in backstory. The audience is assured that yes, Jerry is a vampire, yes, he is very old, yes, there is some sort of vamp mythos, but that's it and that's all we need. Jerry is evil, Charley's family is remarkably swift to believe him (I mean, Jerry does blow up their house. They kinda have to believe him), and the action doesn't stop until Jerry's a heap of ash and Charley is finally getting laid. A couple of fun cameos are present too: the original Jerry, Chris Sarandon, as a motorist drained dry by his 2011 counterpart; Lisa Loeb as McLovin, sorry, Ed's mom (wut); and Dave Franco as a bullying classmate of Charley's. You'll always be Greg the pants-pissing soccer player to me, Dave. People don't forget.



And then there's the Glee 3-D concert movie. Yes, I made my friends take me to see both a vampire remake and a schmaltzy teen musical extravaganza. I have great friends. The Glee movie is exactly what you would expect: by turns totally glorious and totally overwrought. The cast are pretty great live, though I'm sure at least SOME of the sound got tweaked in production, and they only did one song that I really hate (hint: it's an original piece), balanced out by lots that I love ("Don't Stop Believin'", "Teenage Dream", "Valerie", "I Wanna Hold Your Hand", and the pure heart of "Sing It" almost makes me forget that RPF about Grant Morrison and My Chemical Romance exists). The lack of Jenna Ushkowitz is pretty dire--she only gets minutes of stage time and a few opening lines in "Born This Way"--and the overabundance of Lea Michele to be expected. The music is intercut with clips of the cast in character backstage, as well as three mini-storylines following fans of the show. In all, the film is an overproduced, saccharine explosion of sound, confetti, and mile-long smiles. Everything I wanted, pretty much. HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO MEEEEE.


Tuesday, August 09, 2011

#tmituesday: The men who launched Diana into puberty

Admit it, you've always wondered who my pre-adolescent crushes were. Well, here they are, ya nosy weirdos.


Terry McGinnis: Yeah, he's animated (and in all the right ways), but Will Friedle did the voice acting and the Batsuit did the rest. My affections have bounced here and there in the Batfamily since, but Terry was the first.



Dougray Scott: That's what you get for letting me see Ever After, Mom! You thought it would just be a harmless fairy tale movie, but Prince Henri's codpiece stays with me to this day.




Richard Dean Anderson: Not as McGyver--as Colonel Jack O'Neill from Stargate SG-1, still my favorite science fiction television show (sorry, Firefly). The silver fox to end all silver foxes, O'Neill's gruff, snarky badassness gave me a good down-low tickle that I had no idea what to do with...yet.




Ewan McGregor: STAR WARS Episode 1: The Phantom Menace came out at exactly the right time. Is all I'm saying.



Heath Ledger: You're thinking it was Patrick Verona, but it was actually Gabriel Martin from The Patriot, which I wasn't allowed to see, but I looked at the movie guide in Barnes and Noble a lot (bookstores have so much porn in them! I hadn't even discovered romance novels yet).




Jeff Goldblum: before you cut me that side-eye, keep in mind that I wasn't allowed to see Jurassic Park until I was 13. And BOOM! went the shiny new ovaries.

Thursday, July 07, 2011

The things the Internet makes me do

So my best friend, yeah, she's pretty awesome and she has this blog that lots of people read, and a Twitter and Tumblr that lots of people follow, and sometimes these people are a little strange.

Sometimes the strange people are me. Anyway. These are some things that Quinn Fabray might have done with her breast milk.

  • pumped it out and donated it to a mama nearby who needed it
  • pumped it out and sold it on eBay
  • pumped it out and gave it to Shelby to feed baby Beth with
  • let it chill out in her boobs 'til it dried up
  • attempted to deal with the resulting engorgement by binding her breasts, resulting in mastitis
  • breastfed baby Beth for a week or so at Shelby's request
  • hooked up with someone who has a breast milk fetish
Fun fact: when you Google "lactation" the first result is not lactation--it's erotic lactation.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Tunes on the teevee

Ok, so, this is totally a rip-off of geek with curves, but I've been such a pill lately about all the DC stuff, so I figured it was time for something fun and light. Thus, I present Five TV Theme Songs I Never Skip (which are not found on the Curvy Geek's list!).

5. True Blood--"Bad Things" by Jace Everett: these titles sum up the show perfectly: dark, dirty, sexy, and disturbing.


4. Gossip Girl--"Gossip Girl" featuring Kristen Bell: haters best be hatin' on, because I love this garbagey show and its swift, flashy opening sequence.


3. Batman Beyond--"Batman Beyond (Opening Title)" by Kristopher Carter: partly childhood reminiscence, but these credits are actually pretty fantastic (like most other DCAU shows, including Justice League/Unlimited and Gargoyles). Unfortunately un-embeddable, so click here.

2. Buffy the Vampire Slayer--"Buffy Theme" by Nerf Herder: it's a classic, period.


1. Veronica Mars--"We Used to be Friends" by the Dandy Warhols: I really disliked how they revamped the song for S3, but the theme remains one of the best ever.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Embodied Gaze: Final Thoughts

There is so much more that can be said on the topic of vampires, sex, our media, and our culture. Any discussion of how the patriarchy/kyriarchy is depicted in entertainment media must focus some attention on spoken language--partially because media such as books and television shows rely on dialogue to communicate and partially because spoken language is a significant tool in the hand of anyone wanting to gain or keep power. The concept of voice has always been important to feminism, and most other radical movements emphasize the voice as a tool of power, often a tool that has been taken from or denied to a certain populace. Buffy, Hex, and Twilight all use dialogue and voice to characterize and philosophize--and in the cases of the male characters, to patronize and terrorize (is that enough -izes for you?).

Angelus is the most obvious mouthpiece, with Azazeal a close second. The pivotal Angelus/Buffy conversation occurs just after their night together, before Buffy realizes what has happened to her boyfriend ("Innocence"). Angelus' dialogue is rife with trenchant misogynist language carefully constructed to show him as the dregs of a woman-hating society. A sampling of their conversation yields such gems as "Like I really wanted to stick around after that;" "You got a lot to learn about men;" "Let's not talk about it. It happened;" "I thought you were a pro;" and "I should've known you wouldn't be able to handle it." All of these lines are pulled, unfortunately, from the every-day--their oomph comes from the fact that viewers recognize them, have heard them from ex-boyfriends and husbands. These are things that abusive men say to the women they try to use and control. These words infantilize, accuse, mock; they shove women's feelings, desires, and needs to the side.

Azazeal, as we saw in the last installment, also knows how to talk--or rather, exactly what to say to make Cassie either strike out or crumple. His flippant "What else are you for?" is the shit icing on a truly grotesque cake constructed of seemingly offhand lines of dialogue here and there--gently mocking, needlingly cruel. He refers to Cassie as "hormonal" when she is pregnant with his son, tells her what she's feeling instead of asking her. He tells her that she "looks a mess", "looks awful"; says disparagingly that she's "not being very friendly," asks why she is repulsed by him. His attitude and words, too, are pulled straight from life and ring uncomfortably true for many women viewers. This is how we are spoken to and perceived: not in control of our own minds, emotions, and reactions. There is a reason the word is patronize. Cassie refers to Azazeal on several occasions as "arrogant" but the key to Azazeal is that he, as a demigod, literally does not care about human lives or emotions: in his worldview, the humans he encounters are for using as needed and discarding. He makes overtures to Cassie in order to ensnare her, intimating that he cares about her, but Cassie and the viewer know he does not, made evident by the way he toys with her. His pretense of casual male obliviousness (the "I'm just a dumb man" cover) does not disguise the fact that he enjoys outraging and disgusting Cassie. She provided him with what he needed--a son--and when she is killed in the second episode of the second series, he gives her little more thought for the rest of his time onscreen, generally only referring to her as Malachi's mother.

Edward at first seems almost innocuous compared to the forthright evil of Azazeal and Angelus. However, from his first appearance in Twilight, his dialogue tags tell the reader everything we need to know about his character. Throughout the four books there are about fourteen uses of some form of the word "mock"--in Twilight, all eight are attributed to Edward; in Eclipse, four are attributed to Jacob; in Breaking Dawn, one is Jacob's and one is Emmett's. A few more uses of "taunt" occur, all attributed to Jacob. Bella surely does enjoy men who make fun of her. Jacob aside, Edward kicks off his "courtship" of Bella by making fun of her, talking down to her, and infantilizing her.

And then there comes the issue of race, inextricably intertwined with issues of kyriarchy. For all its virtues, Buffy is notable for having very few characters of color, specifically African-Americans, and those that do appear are generally stereotyped and usually end up dead--Kendra is the first, a Slayer who appears in season two and is killed; Mr. Trick, a vampire who appears and is killed in season three; Forrest, the angry soon-to-be zombie Initiative member killed in season four; Sweet, the singing demon of "Once More, With Feeling" vanquished in season five; and Principal Wood, a rather badass freelance vampire hunter appearing in season seven (you can also count his mother, Nikki Wood, a Slayer killed by Spike). Of these characters, one survives the destruction of Sunnydale: Principal Wood. The core cast is unfailingly white and able-bodied. One of the lone Asian characters, Chao-Ahn, is used for comic relief as the Scooby Gang attempt to communicate with her throughout season seven; another Asian character, Chloe, kills herself in S7. There are more demon characters throughout the show than there are characters of color.

Hex does not fare better. The core cast are all white and able-bodied. There is one supporting character of color--Medenham's headmaster, David Tyrel. He IS quite a good character, supportive of and concerned for his students' welfare, intelligent, and unwilling to kowtow to the abuses of Jez Herriott, a demonic priest. But his status on the show smacks of tokenism, and the show itself is certainly not representative of the state of the UK currently, with its exceptionally multicultural society.

Much has been written about the state of race in the Twilight series. A follower of the inimitable Cleolinda Jones Tweeted recently to Cleo concerning the newish The Twilight Saga: The Official Illustrated Guide and its paragraphs on vampire pigmentation--a choice excerpt from the "Pallor" section:

Pale vampire skin is a product of vampire venom's transformative process...regardless of original ethnicity, the vampire's skin will be exceptionally pale. The hue varies slightly, with darker-skinned humans having a barely discernible olive tone to their vampire skin, but the light shade remains the same.

So Meyer's vampires are never black, or Asian, or Native American (notably, there IS a black vampire in the Twilight movies--Laurent is portrayed by an African-American actor. Zafrina, a vampire appearing in Breaking Dawn, will be played by a mixed-race actress. I have to wonder what Meyer thinks about this). Once they are turned, they are as white as white can be. This, coupled with the portrayal of Native Americans in the books, reads horribly familiar to those knowledgeable about LDS cosmology. Much has been made, deservedly, of the "white and delightsome" passages of the Book of Mormon (now changed to "pure and delightsome") as well as the LDS church's history of institutionalized racism. The Twilight books reflect this easily, though it can be argued that after 1976 the LDS church was no longer racist. Pardon my giggles. One of the most striking ways for me in which Meyer's religion bleeds into her writing is in her naming. The main vampire characters have strictly European names--Jasper, Edward, Alice, Laurent, Carlisle, Esme, James, Jane, and so forth. The Quileute werewolves have names pulled from the Bible and Book of Mormon--Jacob, Leah, Seth, Jared, Sam, Paul, Ephraim. It seems almost not worth pointing out where this is deriving from, but the underlying--and in some cases overt--racism of the LDS church cannot be overstated. LDS doctrine states that Native American peoples are descended from Jews straight out of Israel, who fell into wicked ways in the New World and were cursed with dark skin (this part is often played down these days, for obvious reasons. However, as recently as the late 90s, when I was a kid in church, this was taught and understood by most everyone). If this sounds an awful lot like the "Children of Ham" bits in The Handmaid's Tale, well, they're surely kissing cousins. The goal is to become "white/pure and delightsome" once more; in Twilight this reads as "vampires good, werewolves bad," particularly given the "eternal family" of the Cullens with Carlisle the Joseph-Smith-lookalike as patriarch, with juuuust enough nuance on either side to keep the audience generally unsuspicious. But there it is. Once noted, it is difficult to ignore.


Ultimately, the worlds of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Twilight, and Hex are OUR worlds. They are peopled with characters who reflect aspects of US. This is why they are so compelling and so frightening. The media in which they are found are often considered sentimental or reserved exclusively for women; Culler notes in "Reading as a Woman" that "sentimental" movies, books, and television, while superficially playing to women's tastes and interests, simultaneously courts men's visual pleasure via beautiful women in subjugated contexts. With the advent of feminism, more and more entertainment is being made BY women FOR women, including romance and sentimental novels and films, with stories being created around the fantasies and desires of women, rather than being aimed at the fantasies of men. Pop culture IS important. What our brains imbibe affects us deeply. Being as this is a geek blog at heart, I feel comfortable quoting Grand Admiral Thrawn: When you understand a species' art, you understand that species. Our art has for so long reflected the dominant theology of Christianity and the dominant sociology of kyriarchy and the dominant cultural pastime of trampling upon minorities. Buffy and Hex challenge the dominant, with varying degrees of success; Twilight all but revels in it. Each instance has flaws, of commission or omission, particularly in terms of race. Each is a scintillating view into the way US culture demonizes female independence, sexuality, and autonomy.

For far more scholarly and incisive commentary than mine, I recommend the following reads:



This is a teeny sampling of the thoughtful body of scholarly and popular work on these topics. I certainly encourage you to explore beyond what I've written and linked here to find out more.



Friday, April 15, 2011

Geek girls exist?

So. Everyone and their mom is talking about that idiot New York Times review about A Game of Thrones. I am not linking to it; I'm sure you know what I mean; and if you don't, well, whip out your Google fu and hop to it.



I just feel the need to add my voice to the chorus of geek girls out there saying O HAI GINIA BELLAFANTE WE DO EXIST. Because yes--I don't like A Game of Thrones. But that's not because I'm a woman and women don't like fantasy. It's because I am not real huge on fantasy epics that don't end. And here is what I do like:



Star Wars

Doctor Who

The Lord of the Rings (books and films) and The Silmarillion (and o let me tell you how very alone I am in that)

Stories about King Arthur--remember how I have "the once and future king" TATTOOED ON MY SHOULDER?

Jo Walton books (fantasy, speculative fiction, alternate history)

Tamora Pierce books (medieval-style fantasy)

Robin McKinley books (paranormal fiction, fairy tale retellings, fantasy)

Sharon Shinn books (fantasy, science fiction)

Margaret Fucking Atwood, people

Firefly, Buffy, Angel, and Dollhouse

Karen Healey books (fantasy)

Dianne Sylvan books (paranormal fiction)

Alien

Rosemary Sutcliff books (historical fantasy)

Garth Nix books (medieval-style fantasy)

Terry Pratchett books (spastic fantasy)

Scott Westerfeld books (dystopia, alternate history, speculative fiction)

Octavia Butler books (speculative fiction, historical science fiction)

Ursula K. Le Guin books (high fantasy, science fiction)

Philip Pullman books (alternate history, speculative fiction, fantasy)

Neil Gaiman books (fantasy, fantastic graphic novels and comics)

Patricia Wrede books (fantasy)

N.K. Jemisin books (fantasy)

Inception

Frank Herbert books (science fiction)

A whole stinking array of comic books, including but not limited to Batman+Batfamily, Wonder Woman, The Sandman, Deadpool, X-Men, White Tiger, Gotham Central, Gotham City Sirens, Justice League, Ultimates, &cetera

A whole stinking array of cartoons and anime, including but not limited to DuckTales, Batman: The Animated Series, Batman Beyond, Justice League of America/Unlimited, Claymore, pretty much every DC animated movie, Marvel Knights: Black Panther, Baki the Grappler, Miyazaki films, Avatar: The Last Airbender, &cetera

Terminator films, barring the newest one



and a whole fucking lot more "dude stuff" that guess what, plenty of people with vaginas enjoy. Fuck you, Ginia Bellafante. Learn to a) read b) fact-check OR c) skim the Internet for the obvious.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Embodied Gaze: Abject Femininity and Pregnancy as Punishment

The "abject" is defined by Barbara Creed as pertaining to such monstrous notions as "sexual immorality and perversion; corporeal alteration, decay, and death; human sacrifice; murder; the corpse; bodily wastes; and the feminine body and incest." Age-old taboos codified and refined by patriarchal religion, most of these monstrosities are found in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Hex, Twilight, and other entries in the supernatural/horror canon. Sexual immorality is concentrated in Angelus, the master torturer and BDSM aficionado, and in Angel's sexual relationship with Buffy, which toes the line of statutory rape and uneven power dynamics (though Buffy is Angel's equal in terms of physical power, his worldly experience far outweighs hers); it also is found in Edward's concern for not sleeping with Bella prior to their marriage, and is Azazeal's main form of recreational and purposeful activity and the main channel for his long-term plans. Corporeal alteration is all too obvious in the realm of vampirism and demonic possession--when Azazeal possesses a human, their eyes become bloody; the vampires of Twilight are inhumanly beautiful with sparkling skin; the vampires of Buffy have the so-called "game face" which is distorted and hideous. Azazeal literally performs human sacrifices (he murders Cassie's best friend, Thelma, to gain power), while Edward shuns the killing of humans for food and Angelus kills with pleasure and abandon. Of course, the feminine body is the focus of all three media, in varying degrees of lust and disgust.


The female form popularly codes in cinema and literature as something borderline, something which by its existence threatens the dominant form, and something which cannot define itself but which must be defined. According to Wittig, "it is civilization as a whole which produces this creature, intermediate between male and eunuch which is described as feminine." Kyriarchal mores dictate that the Other be controlled, manipulated, subjugated, and used as necessary. These mores are explicated in Buffy, Hex, and Twilight in the form of sexual intercourse, pregnancy, and abortion. Indeed, in Twilight even the setting plays on the theme, as Bella moves from dry, hot Phoenix where no boys ever liked her to damp, green, fecund Forks, where every male in sight falls over themselves trying to win her. Wittig further notes that in the current system, the biological capacity to become pregnant and give birth is what defines the feminine body, a position which Azazeal explicitly states in the Hex episode "Death Takes the Mother", when he says, "What else are you for?" to Cassie after she expresses disbelief that he could have thought she felt privileged to bear his son. All three of these media utilize the fall-out of sex to hammer home a point of some kind. Let us delve:


1. Angel literally turns into the evil boyfriend and attempts to kill Buffy and her friends. Bad.


2. Azazeal impregnates Cassie with his demon-spawn, which weakens the veil between the worlds; its birth will open a gateway for the rest of the nephilim to return. Worse.


3. Edward impregnates Bella with his demon-spawn, which first results in it killing her from the inside and then in him performing a Caesarean with his teeth. Worst.


Ranking out of whack, you say? Surely the return of evil angels to the world of humans is worse than a single human getting a bizarro operation from her lover. True enough. However, in terms of power, Bella is far worse off than either Cassie or Buffy. Bella is almost completely without power. Buffy and Cassie benefit not only from their personal power (Slayer abilities and inherited witchcraft, respectively), but also from a support network: Buffy has the Scooby Gang and her mother, Cassie has Thelma, her sometime-boyfriend Troy, and her teachers Jo and David, who are attentive to and concerned for her. Bella is isolated--her mother is thousands of miles away, she and her father are estranged at worst and not-very-close at best, and she shunts away school friends in preference of a group of "tame" vampires. Furthermore, instead of developing her own personal power in terms of independence and intelligence (she's not a ditz by any means), she lapses into learned helplessness and reliance on Edward. This is the pattern of abusive relationships, which divide one participant, often a woman but sometimes a man, from friends and family and force reliance on the other participant alone. In Twilight, Edward enacts many familiar examples of abusive behavior--he mocks and taunts Bella in one moment and is concerned for her in the next, forces himself into situations in her life where he is not needed, orders and commands her to do things, and infantilizes her by not allowing her to make decisions or do things herself. It is not adequately explained why Bella is attracted to Edward in the first place, with the audience being left to assume that Bella's attraction is what allows her to let Edward act in the ways that he does.

It can be interpreted that sex is bad for Buffy and Cassie because of what happens afterward--but it may also be interpreted that sex is not the villain, but the surrounding provenance is, including the male partners, worldview of the society, and pure chance. For Bella, however, sex IS the Big Bad, even once she and Edward are safely within the bonds of holy matrimony, with pregnancy acting as retribution. For Buffy, pregnancy is never an issue since Angel shoots blanks, though for the sake of argument I am going to consider Angelus the offspring of the Buffy/Angel coupling. For Cassie, out of her mind at the time of intercourse, condoms never entered the question and so Malachi was conceived (presumably Azazeal's demon semen--look a RHYME!--is capable of penetrating plain old earthly rubber in any case. This is actually part of the problem I have with the Superman movies). Bella and Edward conceive a daughter on their wedding night. All of these offspring bring havoc, a horror-trope version of the "actions bring consequences" which anti-choice pundits like to spew. Angelus is an ancient evil, given new life and strength; Malachi is a supernaturally fast-growing half-witch half-nephilim who goes from fetus to teenager in a matter of weeks; and Renesmee, Bella and Edward's daughter...she is not evil, but she is a vampire, and her conception and gestation nearly kill her mother.

Twilight, Hex, and Buffy each play around with the popular view that unwanted pregnancies are what happen to "bad girls," with varying degrees of subversion and reinforcement. In some ways, Hex is the most overtly feminist of the three (Whedon's f-card notwithstanding): Cassie is raped, impregnated, and seeks an abortion, while her lesbian best friend is murdered...with the perpetrator of these violences being the poster boy of the patriarchal system who repeatedly strips women of their power to choose. Historically society's answer to the threat of "bad" men (coded in entertainment as vampires or other monsters) was to keep women cloistered or subjugated to "good" men in the form of patriarchal families. Twilight embraces and develops this, with the Cullen "family" of vampires being the ideal and Bella being in favor of her pregnancy, while Buffy and Hex twist it on its head. The "bad men" of these two worlds are embodiments of patriarchal values, with Azazeal being the most damning artifact, evidenced by the following speech made in the episode "The Release":


Azazeal: For me [the Christmas story is about] the courage of Mary. Imagine the scandal for a young unmarried girl...it was an illicit pregnancy and everyone in Nazareth knew it...Mary knew there was no human father. She had no idea how she'd conceived...imagine her plight, her confusion. A mother nowadays might consider abortion. and there would be no baby Jesus, no Christianity. [Abortion] is an act of Herod. The taking of a human life is a sin. When does human life begin? Does it begin at birth, or it does it begin at the end of the second trimester of pregnancy when the law deems a baby is viable? Life begins at the moment of conception, for that is when the soul is born. People speak to me of women's rights. Who speaks for the child who has no voice? The Lord speaks and his voice is clear. He says to those who would murder a child: I am come, that they may have life.

This speech, made to, funnily enough, a church group gathering for scripture study, sums up the anti-choice movement in the US neatly, hitting all the major talking points--when does life begin, who speaks for the "child", careless throwing-away of women's rights and health issues, the red herring of "you might be killing the next Jesus/star football player/doctor who cures cancer." Images and instances of abortion flourish in all three settings--Cassie attempts to get an abortion (thwarted only because Azazeal has influenced her doctor to save the already-viable fetus) and then tries to kill her son, Malachi, once he is born. Buffy kills Angelus, effectively an abortion (and it must be said: she kills him with a phallic instrument, a sword). Edward actually urges Bella to get an abortion which she does not want, and the realities of her pregnancy urge use of the term in its other sense: as something monstrous.

Angel, in contrast to Azazeal and Edward, represents the virgin/whore dichotomy foisted on women by kyriarchy. Wittig states that "women have been ideologically built into a "natural group"...our bodies as well as our minds are the product of this manipulation," with said manipulation being that all women are the same, all go through the same experiences and all have the same proclivities, habits, and reactions. Neither virginity nor promiscuity is inherently better of a state than the other; furthermore there are hundreds more possible states of existence for women to inhabit. Angel-as-virgin and Angelus-as-whore shows this dichotomy for the silliness that it is--as virgin, Angel is the epitome of courtliness and chivalry, handsome, sensitive, and true to his lady; as whore, Angelus tortures, fornicates, and murders, and does so with a grin and giggle. There is no room for the grey, line-blurring version of Angel (which was developed in his eponymous series later on, to much acclaim). Similarly the virgin/whore roles for women allow no in-between and restrict women's choice.

Bella's longing to become a vampire is two-pronged: first, sex with Edward is conditionally tied to her vampirism, since he fears hurting her, and second, she wants entry into the Cullen "family" with its wealth, culture, and close bond. Given Meyer's religious background, it is not difficult to read the Cullen vampires as the lauded "eternal family" of LDS doctrine and Bella's desire to be part of them as a righteous desire for conversion and salvation. We see Bella's sexual feelings inspired not just by Edward's Adonis looks, but also by what he represents: money, comfort, security, family--the prosperity gospel dressed up as an immortal hunk. And magically, when she is turned, there is no negative fall-out. Her parents do not object; the rest of the Cullens remark on her amazing ability to not go crazy at the scent of human blood; she is beautiful, strong, fast, graceful, immortal, and she can have as much sex with Edward as she likes. Vampirism, one of the ultimate evils of horror entertainment, becomes a gift. In the world of Twilight, the patriarchal figures reward Bella with these wonderful things, prizes to take the place of what she leaves behind her: her biological family? Her independence? A college degree and career? In similar ways our patriarchal powers reward women with, ostensibly and in the best cases, faithful and loving husbands, secure homes and incomes, and a place in heaven, in return for not attempting to overthrow the dominant order. As de Beauvoir has it, women are required in every case to forget self and to love.

Returning to Creed's definition of the abject, it is worth discussing how "corporeal alteration" takes various forms in supernaturally-themed entertainment. Azazeal's possession of Cassie, Bella's vamping, and the mode of siring in the Buffyverse all utilize fluid exchange: the "whole big sucking thing" ("Welcome to the Hellmouth"). Vampires in popular Western literature have always been erotic, and more often than not their erotic qualities code as some form of sexual violation. Azazeal is not a vampire, but he is effectively the same as Angel or Edward--hundreds of years old, perfectly preserved, with supernatural powers which include the power to subvert humans into something else. The power is in the sex. Fluid exchange is key in all of these scenarios--for Cassie to become possessed, Azazeal's blood was involved ("Deeper Into the Darkness"). If Angel had wanted to sire Buffy, he would have sucked her blood and then she his. For Edward to turn Bella, he had to inject her with his venom (Breaking Dawn). All of these are clear cases of penetration and most particularly destruction of the hymen. It could be argued that Cassie's first time is with Azazeal, though she is physically with Troy, since Troy is possessed by Azazeal and has Azazeal's blood in him, facilitating Cassie's possession in turn. And--of course--Buffy and Bella are virgins when they have sex with Angel and Edward. Of particular note is that Bella's devirginization is two-fold, since she is vamped in close proximity to her wedding night with Edward. Post-coitus, the three women continue to have their roles defined for them; in Bella's case, she becomes completely Edward's wife and Renesmee's mother, as well as becoming a vampire, settling into the role of wife-mother comfortably. Cassie and Buffy exist in a state of "defilement" due to their perceived sins--this elicits anger and fear on Buffy's part, shame, anger, and fear on Cassie's (with the shame stemming not from the sex act itself, but from her lack of control). However, Buffy and Cassie resist this role thrust upon them and the strictures of femininity defined by outside male forces, the act of which takes more courage than is readily evident on the surface. Zizek notes that "by opposing patriarchal domination, women sinultaneously undermine the fantasy-support of their own feminine identity," meaning that if the dominant social structure is to be taken down, everything it previously covered will come down as well. When women fight forces which have controlled their lives, the burden of both the fighting and the constructing of a new society falls on them. The surroundings of Buffy and Hex WANT the heroines to recreate society, to dismantle the master's house, to use Lorde's perfect phrase. Bella is also urged to aid in creating a brave new world, but her role remains traditional and prescribed rather than revolutionary.




Creed, B.(1993). The monstrous feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.

De Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex. London: Vintage.

Jones, J. and Watkins, B. (2004-2005). Deeper into the darkness and The Release and Death takes the mother {television broadcast}. UK: Sky One.

Meyer, S. (2008). Breaking dawn. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.

Meyer, S. (2004). Twilight. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.

Whedon, J. (1997). Welcome to the hellmouth {television broadcast}. USA: WB Television Network.

Zizek, S. (1994). The metastases of enjoyment. New York: Verso.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Embodied Gaze: Insertion and Ownership

In "The Androgynous Mind," Woolf notes that the British suffrage movement "must have made [men] lay an emphasis upon their own sex and its characteristics which they would not have troubled to think about had they not been challenged"; Jonathan Culler states that the reader/viewer is assumed to be male, by author, critic, and culture alike. Certainly the relationship between anxious masculinity and the default male body seems clear to modern audiences who give a care to these sorts of things--the default state of the male being has been threatened since Woolf's time and before by feminists and other radical groups. This fear is firmly entrenched in US culture low and high and gives fruit in the media we are discussing here in the form of heterosexual relationships: Bella and Edward, Cassie and Azazeal, and Buffy and Angel. It is important to note that these relationships do not develop organically or more specifically from happenstance. To understand why, we need to delve into the issue of creeperdom. Behold:




1. Angel stalks Buffy once he has turned evil, because he wants to drive her crazy and eventually kill her. However, his introduction into the series (including his retconned introduction) is also in the form of stalking, despite the fact that Buffy tells him not to follow her.

2. Azazeal stalks Cassie because he is evil; namely, because he wants to impregnate her with his demon offspring.

3. Edward stalks Bella because he "loves her" and thinks that watching her sleep, disabling her car, etc. will keep her safe.

Two out of three stalkers recognize that stalking is bad! Don't do it, kids. Stalking is the most obvious manifestation of "power-over" that a man can display without crossing into the territory of rape and physical abuse. Angel's first appearance in BTVS:1 is in the form of stalking, when Buffy is walking home from the Bronze ("Welcome to the Hellmouth"). Later, once Angelus has emerged, he stalks her in earnest and is shot standing outside her house, looking in her windows at night and also into those of her friends, most specifically Willow and Jenny Calendar, two women; he also threatens Buffy's mother ("Passion", "Innocence"). The first time we see Azazeal, he is standing on Medenham's grounds, watching Cassie from various locations--and this is the mode of his appearance for quite some time. After they have met formally, Azazeal steps this behavior up, appearing in Cassie's bedroom to watch her sleep, standing outside her windows, and following her around school and in town; he even pops up in a bar ("Life Goes On"). Edward's notorious stalking begins, arguably, when he prevents Bella from being hit by a car (Twilight) and then escalates into sneaking into her room while she is sleeping, disabling her truck's engine to keep her from leaving her house (Eclipse), and even conscripting his sister, Alice, into watching Bella for him via her visions (Eclipse). How does each girl react? Buffy tells S1 Angel to step off and stop following her, because she hates being followed and can take care of herself; she actively fights S2 Angelus and eventually kills him. Cassie at first tries to understand why Azazeal is following her around--she initially has no notion of her witch ancestry and powers--and then attempts to avoid him. Bella finds Edward's advances romantic and reassuring, for the most part; when she finds out that Edward has been in her room at night, her reaction is horror--because she talks in her sleep and is afraid of what he might have heard (Twilight).


The male gaze in each instance is an embodied, directed thing, no longer an abstract theory but an active agent with an agenda ('ware travelers, here be alliterative agony). In all cases, the male figures insert themselves into the females' lives; they are not sought, but choose to enter with the careless power that is their birthright. Again from Culler: "The experience of being watched, seen as "a girl," restricted, marginalized" is the experience of women in our society since history began. When the default gaze, body, and experience is male, the right to reject that gaze, body, and experience never exists for the subjugated. According to Mulvey in her seminal work "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema," mainstream film (writ large, mainstream culture) "coded the erotic into the language of the dominant patriarchal order." I would change "patriarchal" to "kyriarchal," given that Bella is complicit--or at least unresisting--in her domination by Edward. Cassie is drawn to Azazeal once he has possessed her, and after the possession has worn off, she still feels a residual pull, but she identifies him firmly as villainous. Buffy is in love with Angel, despite his stalking behavior, because he shows himself to be on the side of good. The line between Angel-as-good and Edward-as-good is that Buffy is never at the mercy of Angel, while every interaction and conversation between Bella and Edward shows that Bella is powerless to defend herself against Edward. Cassie too is vulnerable to Azazeal, but she makes the effort of fighting him and trying to direct her own life.


The physicality of our supernatural males' gazes is compounded by what the wielders choose to do with their power. On the scale of natural to unnatural with "natural" being "most true to idealized heterosexual life", Buffy/Angel is the MOST NATURAL relationship with Bella/Edward and Cassie/Azazeal tied for the LEAST NATURAL slot. This is mostly because Azazeal (in the best possibility) tricks and manhandles Cassie into fucking him and (in the worst possibility) rapes her, whilst Angel and Buffy have sex because they're in love and that's what people in love do, should they desire to...and Bella and Edward are fairly psychotic, emotionally. Specifically, Bella's desire is denied to her by Edward until they are married (at the beginning of the fourth book, Breaking Dawn. This extreme lapse has led to referring to the series as "abstinence porn") due to his sense of what is "right," attributed to his old-fashioned sensibilities; a great deal of their time together is spent in mutual unfulfilled desire. He, like Angel, can be considered "human" because of his fight against his monstrous instincts (and is therefore less threatening than, say, James or the Volturi), and Bella is in fact the first to broach the topic and remains open about what she wants to do. The issues are largely on Edward's end, because of his association of sex sans marital bonds with "bad". Buffy and Angel each have desire and it plays out as naturally as possible, given the situation--Buffy reasons that sleeping with Angel is not so bad because his vampireness is tempered by his ensouled state; effectively he is a superpowered human, and neither knows that anything bad will happen if they do have sex AND neither is leading the other on. Cassie is unwilling to have sex with Azazeal of her own will (due to his unabashed evilness, revealed most emphatically when he murders her best friend Thelma), so Azazeal possesses her. Once she is free of the possession, Cassie's revulsion of him returns, though tainted with memories of what had happened between them. Effectively Azazeal date-rapes her vicariously via intercourse with her boyfriend Troy (who, also being possessed, passes the possession on to Cassie) and then engages in technically consensual sex with her while she is possessed, though it's made clear that she is not in control of her body or mind at the time (in the aptly-named episode "Possession").


None of these relationships are what we would deem "healthy." Why then do we lionize and dream after them? What is the major appeal? Angel, Azazeal, and Edward have some things in common: all are immortal, all are handsome, all are supernaturally powered, all are charming. They are fuckable. But where popular opinion, scholarship, and interpretations diverge is on the question of whether there is something inherently wrong with lusting after the Bad Boy. For my money, the inherent wrong is in the power structure in which heterosexual relationships currently operate. If Cassie/Buffy/Bella desired Azazeal/Angel/Edward and wanted to have sex with him, there should be no negative fall-out, because sex is not inherently bad. The negative fall-out in the real world comes from the system of men's ownership of the women they consort with--once fucked, your organs are no longer your own. This system translates in the media we are examining to: Once fucked, evil appears/tries to take over your body/tries to kill you. The blame falls on the woman, though the instrument of evil is the man (or, in the case of Bella, the fruit of the man). Women's sexuality and women's bodies and women's existence are faulted, often for the harm that comes to them (in the form of victim-blaming). Thus it is Buffy's fault that Angel turns into Angelus; Bella's fault that her fetus is killing her from the inside (and her fault that Edward can't resist her, her fault that Jacob is attracted to her, her fault that James and then the Volturi want to kill her, her fault that Jasper cannot control himself around her, etc. etc. etc. All the fault of Bella's freesia-scented blood); Cassie's fault that the Nephilim return to Earth and Malachi, her and Azazeal's son, is going to tear the world apart.


The crux of Angel, Azazeal, and Edward's behavior is a tendency toward voyeurism, evidenced most clearly by their stalking. Again Mulvey--the pleasure of voyeurism "lies in ascertaining guilt...asserting control and subjugating the guilty person through punishment or forgiveness." With regard to our supernatural men and human women, this definition can be applied two ways:

First, the guilty party is the female (the watched), by virtue of her existence or a slight, perceived or real. The righteous party (the male watcher) applies punishment via sexual avenues. Angelus threatens Buffy's life in overtly sexual ways--the aftermath of their lovemaking, when Angelus has emerged from Angel, is rife with carefully stereotypical misogynist language; he sends her flowers as a subversion of a romantic gesture. Edward denies Bella sexual intercourse, which she desires. Azazeal rapes Cassie after she denies him sexual intercourse.

Second, the guilty party is the male (the watcher), by virtue of his state as voyeur, which goes against what the righteous female (the watched) desires. Buffy fights back against Angelus and ultimately kills him. Bella is bitten (coded in sexual terms as "used" or "damaged") by James, an evil vampire, forcing Edward to save her. Cassie resists Azazeal's further attempts and tries to kill his child.


Both definitions are intriguing and applicable to our situations. The first is the default state, with the watched female body and audience complicit in the male gaze. The second is what happens when the woman and audience wake up--no longer is Edward able to tell Bella, "No one will believe you" with impunity, and Angelus' taunt that Buffy is powerless with her weapons and friends taken from her is shown for the lie it is. Once aware, we are capable of seeing what Bella sees: that there is something profoundly different about Edward, and furthermore, that our eyes do not deceive us. We are capable of continuing on our own, without husband or friends or tools if necessary, for we are humans too.




Culler, J. (1983). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Jones, J. and Watkins, L. (2004). Life goes on and Possession {television broadcast}. UK: Shine Limited.

Meyer, S. (2004). Twilight. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.

Meyer, S. (2007). Eclipse. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.

Mulvey, L. (2009). Visual and other pleasures. Boston: Palgrave Macmillan.

Whedon, J. (1997-98). Welcome to the hellmouth and Passion and Innocence. {television broadcast}. USA: Mutant Enemy Productions.

Woolf, V. (1989). A room of one's own. New York: Mariner Books.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...